Hospital Harm: Procedure-Associated Shock
Shock is a state of organ hypoperfusion with resultant cellular dysfunction and death. Mechanisms may involve decreased circulating volume, decreased cardiac output, and vasodilation, sometimes with shunting of blood to bypass capillary exchange beds (Procter, 2020). It is a clinical state that occurs when a mismatch arises between oxygen supply and metabolic demand, resulting in cellular hypoxia. If not recognized and treated appropriately, shock will ultimately progress to organ failure (Broussard & Ural, 2018; Gaieski & Mikkelsen, 2018; Vincent & De Backer, 2013). It is one of the leading causes of death in hospitalized patients (Nichol & Ahmed, 2014).
- Topics
- Patient safety
- Hospital harm
- Audience
Point of care provider
Quality or safety improvement lead
Policy advisor or analyst
:quality(80))
Goal
Reduce the incidence of procedure-associated shock.
Overview and Implications
Healthcare Excellence Canada has developed this Hospital Harm Improvement Resource – a compilation of resources to support patient safety and improvement efforts.
There are several types of shock that a patient may experience during or after a procedure. Mechanisms of organ hypoperfusion and shock may be due to a low circulating volume (hypovolemic shock), vasodilation (distributive shock), a primary decrease in cardiac output (both cardiogenic and obstructive shock), or a combination of all of them. Untreated shock is usually fatal. Even with treatment, mortality from cardiogenic shock after myocardial infarction [MI] (60 to 65 per cent) and septic shock (30 to 40 per cent) is high. Prognosis depends on the cause, preexisting or complicating illness, time between onset and diagnosis, and promptness and adequacy of therapy (Procter, 2020).
Organ dysfunction in patients can be represented by an increase in the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score (Vincent et al., 1996) of two points or more, which is associated with an in-hospital mortality greater than 10 per cent. Patients with septic shock can be identified by a vasopressor requirement to maintain a mean arterial pressure of 65 mm Hg or greater AND serum lactate level greater than 2 mmol/L in the absence of hypovolemia (i.e. after adequate fluid resuscitation). This combination is associated with hospital mortality rates greater than 40 per cent (Singer et al., 2016).
Table 1 was created by Dr. Denny Laporta at the Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, QC (Laporta, 2018). The table summarizes the various types of shock that may be encountered in the peri-procedure period. In hypovolemic shock the reduced cardiac output is due to a reduction in circulating volume and consequent venous return. It may be due to hemorrhage or when large volumes of fluid are lost perioperatively – expectedly or unexpectedly.
Table 1: Examples of shock1 occurring during or after a procedure
Peri-Procedure Period | Type of shock | Causes |
Hypovolemic | Bleeding | Excess loss of non-blood fluid:
|
Cardiogenic | Myocardial Infarction | Pre-existing:
|
Obstructive | Pulmonary embolism |
|
Distributive | Septic syndrome | Other (non-infectious) causes of systemic inflammatory response (SIRS):
Other adverse drug reactions:
Spinal shock (neuraxial blockade) Adrenal insufficiency (chronic steroid use) Miscellaneous:
|
1These may occur as single causes or in combination.
Importance to Patients and Families
Procedure related shock can cause serious harm and death if not treated quickly. Knowing the signs to watch for, along with a prompt and appropriate response, can help save lives.
Family members will often identify changes in the patient's alertness and level of awareness, as well as the patient's restlessness and agitation. Deterioration may not be recognized or acted upon by healthcare providers, resulting in preventable patient safety incidents. Monitoring, observation, family consultation and communication are key to managing this risk (HIROC, 2020).
Patient Stories
Hear, and feel free to share Erin's and Jen's powerful stories via "Sepsis Emergency™" as provided by the Sepsis Alliance (Sepsis Alliance, 2014). https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DnsQ4RlXsZY
Clinical and System Reviews, Incident Analyses
Given the broad range of potential causes of Procedure-Associated Shock, in addition to recommendations listed above, we recommend conducting clinical and system reviews to identify latent causes and determine appropriate recommendations.
Occurrences of harm are often complex with many contributing factors. Organizations need to:
Measure and monitor the types and frequency of these occurrences.
Use appropriate analytical methods to understand the contributing factors.
Identify and implement solutions or interventions that are designed to prevent recurrence and reduce risk of harm.
Have mechanisms in place to mitigate consequences of harm when it occurs.
To develop a more in-depth understanding of the care delivered to patients, chart audits, incident analyses and prospective analyses can be helpful in identifying quality improvement opportunities. Links to key resources for conducting chart audits and analysis methods are included in the Hospital Harm Improvement Resource Introduction.
If your review reveals that your cases of Procedure-Associated Shock are linked to specific processes or procedures, you may find these resources helpful:
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality www.ahrq.gov
AHRQ. Introduction to the toolkit for using the AHRQ quality indicators: How to improve hospital quality and safety. AHRQ; 2013. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/systems/hospital/qitoolkit/combined/combined_toolkit.pdf
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). PSI (Patient Safety Indicator) 09: Postoperative hemorrhage or hematoma. Selected best practices and suggestions for improvement. AHRQ; 2013. Available at: https://www.ahrq.gov/sites/default/files/wysiwyg/professionals/systems/hospital/qitoolkit/combined/d4f_combo_psi09-postophemorrhage-bestpractices.pdf
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS) www.aaos.org
Preventing venous thromboembolic disease in patients undergoing elective hip and knee arthroplasty: Evidence-based guideline and evidence report. 2nd edition. Rosemont, IL; AAOS: 2011. https://www.aaos.org/globalassets/quality-and-practice-resources/vte/vte_full_guideline_10.31.16.pdf
American College of Surgeons https://www.facs.org/
American College of Surgeons. ATLS® Advanced Trauma Life Support® 10th Edition https://viaaerearcp.files.wordpress.com/2018/02/atls-2018.pdf
American Society of Anesthesiologists, Standards and Guidelines https://www.asahq.org/standards-and-practice-parameters
American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Guidelines https://www.asge.org/home/resources/publications/guidelines
Anderson MA, Ben-Menachem T, Gan SI, et al. American Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE) Standards of Practice Committee. Management of antithrombotic agents for endoscopic procedures. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009; 70(6):1060-70. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.09.040.
Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland https://anaesthetists.org/
Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland, Thomas D, Wee M, et al. Blood transfusion and the anaesthetist: management of massive haemorrhage. Anaesthesia. 2010; 65 (11): 1153-1161. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3032944/
Blood Transfusion
Theusinger, O. M., Kind, S. L., Seifert, B., Borgeat, L., Gerber, C., Spahn, D. R. (2014). Patient blood management in orthopaedic surgery: a four-year follow-up of transfusion requirements and blood loss from 2008 to 2011 at the Balgrist University Hospital in Zurich, Switzerland. Blood Transfusion, 12, 195-203. https://dx.doi.org/10.2450/2014.0306-13 Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4039701/
British Journal of Haematology https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/13652141
Hunt BJ, Allard S, Keeling David, et al. A practical guideline for the haematological management of major haemorrhage. Br J Haematol. 2015; 170 (6): 788-803. doi: 10.1111/bjh.13580. Available at: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/bjh.13580
Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology https://journals.lww.com/clinicalobgyn/pages/default.aspx
Yu, S. P., Cohen, J. G., Parker, W. H. (2015). Management of hemorrhage during gynecologic surgery. Clinical Obstetrics & Gynecology, 58, 718-1. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/GRF.0000000000000147
Critical Care Clinics www.criticalcare.theclinics.com
Cantle PM, Cotton BA. Prediction of massive transfusion in trauma. Crit Care Clin. 2017; 33(1): 71-84. doi: 10.1016/j.ccc.2016.08.002
Current Opinion in Anesthesiology https://journals.lww.com/co-anesthesiology/pages/default.aspx
Butwicka AJ, Goodnough LT. Transfusion and coagulation management in major obstetric hemorrhage. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 2015, 28:275–284. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000180. Available at: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4567035/
ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) Society Guidelines http://erassociety.org/guidelines/list-of-guidelines/
Kozek-Langenecker SA, Ahmed AB, Afshari A, et al. Management of severe perioperative bleeding: guidelines from the European Society of Anaesthesiology: First update 2016. European Journal of Anaesthesiology | EJA. 2017;34(6). doi:10.1097/EJA.0000000000000630
European Society of Intensive Care Medicine https://www.esicm.org
Cecconi M, De Backer D, Antonelli M, et al. Consensus on circulatory shock and hemodynamic monitoring. Task force of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine. Intensive Care Med. 2014;40(12):1795-1815. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3525-z
Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI) www.ihi.org
Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). How-to guide: Prevent harm from high-alert medications. Cambridge, MA: IHI; 2012. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/HowtoGuidePreventHarmfromHighAlertMedications.aspx
Journal of Emergency Trauma Shock www.onlinejets.org/
Balvers K, Coppens M, van Dieren S, et al. Effects of a hospital-wide introduction of a massive transfusion protocol on blood product ratio and blood product waste. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2015;8(4):199-204. doi:10.4103/0974-2700.166597
Merck Manual Professional Version www.merckmanuals.com
Procter LD. Shock. Merck Manuals Professional Edition. Merck Manuals Professional Edition. Published October 2020. Accessed March 2021. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/critical-care-medicine/shock-and-fluid-resuscitation/shock
National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) www.nice.org.uk
New England Journal of Medicine www.nejm.org
Vincent J-L, De Backer D. Circulatory Shock. N Engl J Med. 2013;369(18):1726-1734. doi:10.1056/NEJMra1208943
Royal College of Anaesthetists www.rcoa.ac.uk
Seminars in Thrombosis and Hemostatsis
James AH, Grotegut C, Ahmadzia H, Peterson-Layne C, Lockhart E. Management of Coagulopathy in Postpartum Hemorrhage. Semin Thromb Hemost. 2016;42(7):724-731. doi:10.1055/s-0036-1593417
Society of Critical Care Medicine https://www.sccm.org/Research/Journals/Critical-Care-Medicine
Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International Guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Crit Care Med. 2017;45(3). doi:10.1097/CCM.0000000000002255
UPTODATE www.uptodate.com
Gaieski DF, Mikkelsen ME. Evaluation of and initial approach to the adult patient with undifferentiated hypotension and shock. UpToDate. 2018 October, last updated. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/evaluation-of-and-initial-approach-to-the-adult-patient-with-undifferentiated-hypotension-and-shock
Hrymak C, Funk DJ, O'Connor MF, Jacobsohn E. Intraoperative management of shock in adults. UpToDate. 2018 July, last updated. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/intraoperative-management-of-shock-in-adults?search=Intraoperative%20management%20of%20shock%20in%20adults&source=search_result&selectedTitle=1~150&usage_type=default&display_rank=1
Parker WH, Wagener WH. Management of hemorrhage in gynecologic surgery. UpToDate. 2018 May, last updated. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/management-of-hemorrhage-in-gynecologic-surgery
Siparsky N. Overview of postoperative fluid therapy in adults. UpToDate. 2018 May, last updated. https://www.uptodate.com/contents/overview-of-postoperative-fluid-therapy-in-adults
For additional references you may also find the following Hospital Harm Improvement Resources helpful:
Measures
Vital to quality improvement is measurement, and this applies specifically to implementation of interventions. The chosen measures will help to determine whether an impact is being made (primary outcome), whether the intervention is actually being carried out (process measures), and whether any unintended consequences ensue (balancing measures). In selecting your measures, consider the following:
:quality(80))
You may use different measures or modify the measures described below to make them more appropriate and/or useful to your particular setting. However, be aware that modifying measures may limit the comparability of your results to others.
:quality(80))
Evaluate your choice of measures in terms of the usefulness of the final results and the resources required to obtain them; try to maximize the former while minimizing the latter.
:quality(80))
Whenever possible, use measures you are already collecting for other programs.
:quality(80))
Try to include both process and outcome measures in your measurement scheme.
Discharge Abstract Database
Discharge Abstract Database (DAD) Codes included in this clinical category: D25: Procedure-Associated Shock
Concept: Shock during or resulting from a procedure.
Code: Code Description
T81.1: Identified as diagnosis type (2) AND Y60-84 in the same diagnostic cluster
Code: Code Description
T81.1: Shock during or resulting from a procedure, not elsewhere classified
Additional Codes: Inclusions
Y60-84: Complications of medical and surgical care (refer to Appendix A) of the Hospital Harm Indicator General Methodology Notes.
Success Stories
Surviving Sepsis
In April 2008, a 70-year-old independent lady with no previous comorbidities became a grandmother for the first time and was looking forward to watching her family grow-up. She developed a cough' became breathless and presented to her local hospital. She was admitted and developed severe sepsis and septic shock secondary to her community-acquired pneumonia; she died within seven hours. Her sepsis was not recognized, and antibiotics and fluids were not given in a timely manner. The patient's family and the well-meaning and competent medical and nursing team were devastated.
So begins the account of a real patient story that compelled Dr. Matt Inada-Kim and colleagues to tackle the problem of managing sepsis within their practice (Patient Stories, 2020).
https://www.patientstories.org.uk/recent-posts/surviving-sepsis-a-human-factors-approach/
References
Broussard D, Ural K. Cardiovascular problems in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). UpToDate. 2018 June 5, last update.
Gaieski DF, Mikkelsen ME. Evaluation of and initial approach to the adult patient with undifferentiated hypotension and shock. UpToDate. 2018 October, last updated.
HIROC. Risk reference sheet: Failure to appreciate status changes/deteriorating patients. Acute care. Toronto, ON: HIROC; 2016. https://www.hiroc.com/getmedia/ab1d0552-af52-4b71-b4c1-4ba8b643b27e/2_Failure-to-Appreciate-Status-Change.pdf.aspx?ext=.pdf
Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). How-to guide: Prevent harm from high-alert medications. Cambridge, MA: IHI; 2012. http://www.ihi.org/resources/Pages/Tools/HowtoGuidePreventHarmfromHighAlertMedications.aspx
Laporta D. Types of shock encountered in the peri-procedure period. Personal communication; 2018 Marc.
Nichol A, Ahmed B. Shock: causes, initial assessment, and investigations. Anesth Intens Care Med. 2014: 15 (2): 64-67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mpaic.2013.12.008
Procter LD. Shock. Merck Manuals Professional Edition. Merck Manuals Professional Edition. Published October 2020. Accessed March 2021. https://www.merckmanuals.com/professional/critical-care-medicine/shock-and-fluid-resuscitation/shock
Singer M, et. al. The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3). Journal of the American Medical Association. 2016; 315 (8): 801-810.
Vincent JL, De Backer D. Circulatory shock. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369 (18): 1726-1734. doi: 10.1056/NEJMra1208943. Available at: https://www.nejm.org/doi/10.1056/NEJMra1208943?url_ver=Z39.88-2003&rfr_id=ori%3Arid%3Acrossref.org&rfr_dat=cr_pub%3Dwww.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov&
:quality(80))
:quality(80))
:quality(80))